Evidence note
Onboarding journey
The public case study describes the manual onboarding path and proposed self-serve flow; detailed journey materials remain confidential.
HP Inc. / Commerce platform modernization
As the sole India-based product manager, I partnered with a US-based PM and engineering to translate a Platform-Tenant modernization into clearer requirements, roadmap decisions, and a high-fidelity onboarding-portal prototype for four dependent tenant teams.
01Context
HP's e-commerce modernization was refactoring legacy Adobe Commerce modules toward a unified Platform-Tenant model built around the Single Responsibility Principle. Four tenant teams depended directly on the platform, so technical changes also created a product-communication and coordination problem.
I worked with the US-based PM, engineering, architecture, and program partners to connect FY26 platform outcomes and quarterly goals to executable work while keeping tenant teams informed about releases and platform direction.
02What needed attention
03How I approached it
Ownership boundary
I owned product requirements, prototyping, roadmap execution, and cross-team alignment within a broader platform program. Engineering and architecture owned the technical design and implementation.
04Evidence boundary
The source materials behind this work include journey maps, prototype screens, platform-tenant explainers, and requirements. The public version describes the evidence boundary without exposing HP internal materials.
Evidence note
The public case study describes the manual onboarding path and proposed self-serve flow; detailed journey materials remain confidential.
Evidence note
The public case study explains how the high-fidelity prototype made platform concepts concrete without publishing internal screens.
Evidence note
The public case study summarizes platform and tenant responsibilities while keeping internal diagrams private.
Evidence note
The public case study names the functional requirement style and architect-review boundary without publishing internal requirements.
05Delivery and results boundary
Before leaving the program, I completed the onboarding requirements and iterated the clickable prototype through architecture review. The defensible outcome is a clearer, reviewable product direction for replacing a three-to-four-month manual pain point.
Measurement boundary
I did not witness the portal launch or measure its post-launch performance. This story therefore makes no claim that onboarding time was reduced, that the portal shipped, or that tenant adoption changed.
06Reflection
The most useful role of the prototype was to turn a platform concept into something product, architecture, and tenant teams could inspect together. This public story keeps the trade-offs, review moments, and evidence boundary visible without exposing internal HP materials.